Discussion:
Sir Gregory Burke fake user agent
(too old to reply)
Anonymous
2019-07-26 23:54:40 UTC
Permalink
Usenet Header Categories and Common Headers

All Usenet headers are defined according to the standard header format defined in RFC 822:

<header name>: <header value>

As with e-mail messages, headers may extend on to multiple lines, following the indenting procedure described in the RFC 822 standard.

The current standard for Usenet messages, RFC 1036, describes the header types for Usenet messages. The headers are divided into two categories: mandatory headers and optional headers. Some are the same as headers of the equivalent name used for e-mail, some are similar to e-mail headers but used in a slightly different way, while others are unique to Usenet. Table 264 describes these header fields and how they are used.
Sir Gregory Hall, Esq.
2019-07-27 17:09:20 UTC
Permalink
Post by Anonymous
Usenet Header Categories and Common Headers
<header name>: <header value>
As with e-mail messages, headers may extend on to multiple lines, following the indenting procedure
described in the RFC 822 standard.
The current standard for Usenet messages, RFC 1036, describes the header types for Usenet messages.
The headers are divided into two categories: mandatory headers and optional headers. Some are the
same as headers of the equivalent name used for e-mail, some are similar to e-mail headers but used
in a slightly different way, while others are unique to Usenet. Table 264 describes these header fields
and how they are used.
One wonders where the good Colonel Burke comes up with
a following of such ignorant rabble as demonstrated above?

LOL
--
Yours Truly, Sir Gregory

Nadegda, kensi and Pandora ยป the three are easily
ignored misandrists and anti-American, leftist liars.
%
2019-07-27 17:36:50 UTC
Permalink
Post by Sir Gregory Hall, Esq.
Post by Anonymous
Usenet Header Categories and Common Headers
<header name>: <header value>
As with e-mail messages, headers may extend on to multiple lines, following the indenting procedure
described in the RFC 822 standard.
The current standard for Usenet messages, RFC 1036, describes the header types for Usenet messages.
The headers are divided into two categories: mandatory headers and optional headers. Some are the
same as headers of the equivalent name used for e-mail, some are similar to e-mail headers but used
in a slightly different way, while others are unique to Usenet. Table 264 describes these header fields
and how they are used.
One wonders where the good Colonel Burke comes up with
a following of such ignorant rabble as demonstrated above?
LOL
people like to slap stupid people just like what you get here
tom
2019-07-31 20:32:35 UTC
Permalink
On Sat, 27 Jul 2019 10:36:50 -0700
Post by %
Post by Sir Gregory Hall, Esq.
Post by Anonymous
Usenet Header Categories and Common Headers
All Usenet headers are defined according to the standard header
<header name>: <header value>
As with e-mail messages, headers may extend on to multiple lines,
following the indenting procedure described in the RFC 822
standard.
The current standard for Usenet messages, RFC 1036, describes the
header types for Usenet messages. The headers are divided into two
categories: mandatory headers and optional headers. Some are the
same as headers of the equivalent name used for e-mail, some are
similar to e-mail headers but used in a slightly different way,
while others are unique to Usenet. Table 264 describes these
header fields and how they are used.
One wonders where the good Colonel Burke comes up with
a following of such ignorant rabble as demonstrated above?
LOL
people like to slap stupid people just like what you get here
What's this to do with coffee?

Loading...